Ubuntu
lsb package

Branches for Lucid

Name	Status	Last Modified	Last Commit
lp://qastaging/ubuntu/lucid-proposed/lsb	2 Mature	2012-10-10 19:50:32 UTC 2012-10-10	40. If a pidfile is specified, but doesn'... Author: Adam Stokes Revision Date: 2012-10-10 14:26:06 UTC If a pidfile is specified, but doesn't provide a PID to test, return 'not running', and return 'unknown' if the pidfile exists but is unreadable (LP: #683640)
lp://qastaging/ubuntu/lucid-updates/lsb	2 Mature	2012-10-28 15:15:14 UTC 2012-10-28	40. If a pidfile is specified, but doesn'... Author: Adam Stokes Revision Date: 2012-10-10 14:26:06 UTC If a pidfile is specified, but doesn't provide a PID to test, return 'not running', and return 'unknown' if the pidfile exists but is unreadable (LP: #683640)
lp://qastaging/ubuntu/lucid/lsb	1 Development	2010-02-23 11:13:18 UTC 2010-02-23	39. * sendmail, debian/control, debian/ru... Author: Till Kamppeter Revision Date: 2010-02-22 23:50:49 UTC * sendmail, debian/control, debian/rules, debian/lsb-invalid-mta.dirs: Added new binary package "lsb-invalid-mta" containing a fake /usr/sbin/sendmail so that the installation of LSB packages does not pull in an MTA any more, which once adds awkward configuration questions to the installation process and second adds an often unnneeded daemon to the system (LP: #141641). * debian/control: The LSB requires the printing environment already since version 3.2. Made lsb-printing required by the "lsb" package not only suggested (LP: #386128).