Merge lp://qastaging/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/heat/kilo-support into lp://qastaging/~openstack-charmers-archive/charms/trusty/heat/next

Proposed by Ryan Beisner
Status: Merged
Merged at revision: 36
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/heat/kilo-support
Merge into: lp://qastaging/~openstack-charmers-archive/charms/trusty/heat/next
Diff against target: 113 lines (+96/-1)
2 files modified
metadata.yaml (+1/-1)
templates/kilo/api-paste.ini (+95/-0)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/heat/kilo-support
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Corey Bryant (community) Needs Fixing
Review via email: mp+251995@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

* trusty-kilo heat api-paste.ini changes (bug 1428770)
* versioned the templates with this branch
* misc. cleanup

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_lint_check #2484 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    LINT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_lint_check/2484/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_unit_test #2274 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    UNIT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_unit_test/2274/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_amulet_test #2356 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    AMULET FAIL: amulet-test missing

AMULET Results (max last 2 lines):
INFO:root:Search string not found in makefile target commands.
ERROR:root:No make target was executed.

Full amulet test output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10542115/
Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_amulet_test/2356/

Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :

Setting back to WIP for P, T, U, V deploy testing.

Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :

Deployed in the following combos, confirmed heat-api svc start OK.

p-i
t-i
t-j
t-k

Clear to merge/review from my perspective.

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_lint_check #2485 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    LINT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_lint_check/2485/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_unit_test #2275 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    UNIT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_unit_test/2275/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_amulet_test #2357 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    AMULET FAIL: amulet-test missing

AMULET Results (max last 2 lines):
INFO:root:Search string not found in makefile target commands.
ERROR:root:No make target was executed.

Full amulet test output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10542331/
Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_amulet_test/2357/

Revision history for this message
Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote :

I noticed the symlinks and I think this needs some changes. Here's the documentation on how templates are chosen. http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~charm-helpers/charm-helpers/devel/view/head:/charmhelpers/contrib/openstack/templating.py#L151

39. By Ryan Beisner

simplifiy templates (use fallback)

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_lint_check #2486 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    LINT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_lint_check/2486/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_unit_test #2276 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    UNIT OK: passed

Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_unit_test/2276/

Revision history for this message
uosci-testing-bot (uosci-testing-bot) wrote :

charm_amulet_test #2358 heat-next for 1chb1n mp251995
    AMULET FAIL: amulet-test missing

AMULET Results (max last 2 lines):
INFO:root:Search string not found in makefile target commands.
ERROR:root:No make target was executed.

Full amulet test output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/10542644/
Build: http://10.245.162.77:8080/job/charm_amulet_test/2358/

Revision history for this message
Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) wrote :

This looks good to me, except for the one inline comment below.

Also, I think we might need this change across the board for all charms that have similar api config files. We might just be getting lucky so far with those.

review: Needs Fixing
Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :

Replied inline (tldr, yes on purpose).

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches