Merge lp://qastaging/~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111 into lp://qastaging/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside

Proposed by Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Status: Merged
Merged at revision: 3
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111
Merge into: lp://qastaging/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside
Diff against target: 153 lines (+6/-65)
2 files modified
debian/changelog (+6/-0)
examples/qobject_reference.py (+0/-65)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Zygmunt Krynicki (community) Needs Information
Review via email: mp+249655@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Commit message

Import last git revision: 1.4~git20150111

Description of the change

Please, include latest revision of pyotherside. It fixes various bugs (including compilation errors with Qt5.4 that we'll ship soon) and adds some nice features.
Unfortunately upstream didn't prepare a 1.4 release yet, but I'm using this for some time and I consider it stable.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga) wrote :

Hey.

Thanks for proposing this. It looks okay though I'd like to know how to actually get this into Ubuntu as in the past it would just sync from Debian. I cannot upload to Ubuntu (nor Debian) directly so I'm not sure how to proceed.

Oh, and one more question below (inline)

review: Needs Information
Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) wrote :

Well, then I think we'd need someone to sponsor us... :)

Revision history for this message
Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) wrote :

Checking out https://github.com/thp/pyotherside, I end up with the following diff if I compare this branch to that: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10288344/

It'd look like this MP does not truly contain the 20150111 git snapshot, but something older? Both build fine.

Revision history for this message
Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga) wrote :

I think I would prefer if we could get a new release of pyotherside
out (the upstream is very responsive) and go through Debian, as usual.
I'll see if I can do that today.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Timo Jyrinki
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Checking out https://github.com/thp/pyotherside, I end up with the following diff if I compare this branch to that: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10288344/
>
> It'd look like this MP does not truly contain the 20150111 git snapshot, but something older? Both build fine.
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111/+merge/249655
> You are reviewing the proposed merge of lp:~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111 into lp:ubuntu/pyotherside.

Revision history for this message
Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) wrote :

I managed to check and upload also https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyotherside/1.4.0~git20150111-0ubuntu1 so this's now practically in, but if a new release is made by end of tomorrow (Feature Freeze) we can also sync that then from Debian instead.

Revision history for this message
Zygmunt Krynicki (zyga) wrote :

Thanks a lot !

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Timo Jyrinki
<email address hidden> wrote:
> I managed to check and upload also https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyotherside/1.4.0~git20150111-0ubuntu1 so this's now practically in, but if a new release is made by end of tomorrow (Feature Freeze) we can also sync that then from Debian instead.
> --
> https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111/+merge/249655
> You are reviewing the proposed merge of lp:~3v1n0/ubuntu/vivid/pyotherside/bump-to-1.4.0-git20150111 into lp:ubuntu/pyotherside.

Revision history for this message
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) (3v1n0) wrote :

2015-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Timo Jyrinki <email address hidden>:

> Checking out https://github.com/thp/pyotherside, I end up with the
> following diff if I compare this branch to that:
> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10288344/
>
> It'd look like this MP does not truly contain the 20150111 git snapshot,
> but something older? Both build fine.
>
>
>
Wow, you're right... I don't know what happened when pushing this branch
but indeed I pushed the wrong revision :(
Indeed having an upstream release now would be nice, so let's see what
upstream says, otherwise it would probably better to fix this with fresher
code. Sorry about that. :(

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches