Mir

Merge lp://qastaging/~afrantzis/mir/fix-1344024 into lp://qastaging/mir

Proposed by Alexandros Frantzis
Status: Merged
Approved by: Alan Griffiths
Approved revision: no longer in the source branch.
Merged at revision: 1805
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~afrantzis/mir/fix-1344024
Merge into: lp://qastaging/mir
Diff against target: 346 lines (+92/-63)
11 files modified
src/server/shell/CMakeLists.txt (+1/-1)
src/server/shell/default_configuration.cpp (+2/-2)
src/server/shell/default_placement_strategy.cpp (+3/-12)
src/server/shell/default_placement_strategy.h (+8/-8)
tests/acceptance-tests/CMakeLists.txt (+1/-0)
tests/acceptance-tests/test_focus_selection.cpp (+0/-1)
tests/acceptance-tests/test_server_without_active_outputs.cpp (+64/-0)
tests/integration-tests/session_management.cpp (+1/-4)
tests/mir_test_framework/stubbed_server_configuration.cpp (+7/-0)
tests/unit-tests/shell/CMakeLists.txt (+1/-1)
tests/unit-tests/shell/test_default_placement_strategy.cpp (+4/-34)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~afrantzis/mir/fix-1344024
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Alan Griffiths Approve
PS Jenkins bot (community) continuous-integration Approve
Review via email: mp+228484@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Commit message

server: Allow clients to create surfaces even when there are no active outputs (LP: #1344024)

This is fixed by removing obsolete placement rules from our default placement
policy. These rules had the side-effect of prohibiting surface creation when
there were no active outputs.

Description of the change

server: Allow clients to create surfaces even when there are no active outputs

This is fixed by removing obsolete placement rules from our default placement
policy. These rules had the side-effect of prohibiting surface creation when
there were no active outputs.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote :
review: Approve (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
PS Jenkins bot (ps-jenkins) wrote :
review: Approve (continuous-integration)
Revision history for this message
Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote :

Maybe the default could be better, but this will do for now.

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches