Merge lp://qastaging/~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment into lp://qastaging/~landscape/landscape-charm/trunk
Proposed by
Andreas Hasenack
| Status: | Merged |
|---|---|
| Approved by: | Andreas Hasenack |
| Approved revision: | 203 |
| Merged at revision: | 201 |
| Proposed branch: | lp://qastaging/~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment |
| Merge into: | lp://qastaging/~landscape/landscape-charm/trunk |
| Diff against target: |
72 lines (+35/-9) 2 files modified
README.md (+29/-9) config/landscape-deployments.yaml (+6/-0) |
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://qastaging/~ahasenack/landscape-charm/new-dense-target-experiment |
| Related bugs: |
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Ekanayaka (community) | Approve | ||
| Geoff Teale (community) | Approve | ||
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Commit message
New deployer target called "landscape-dense", that deploys a working LDS on the bootstrap node on providers other than MAAS.
Description of the change
This adds a new deployer target called "landscape-dense". It's just like "landscape-
The trick is simple: we only need the frontend (apache2) to be reachable from the "outside". So I co-locate apache2 on the bootstrap node, and deploy the rest on containers.
I wondered if we need to keep the maas-only target. It's cleaner, in the sense that no hulk-smashing is done. But landscape-dense works everywhere. Discuss! :)
To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
| Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote | # |
Preview Diff
[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
+1 Tested on scapestack, works a treat!