Merge lp://qastaging/~andrebachmann-dd/bzr-explorer/fix-bzrlog into lp://qastaging/bzr-explorer

Proposed by André Bachmann
Status: Merged
Approved by: Martin Packman
Approved revision: 567
Merged at revision: 566
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~andrebachmann-dd/bzr-explorer/fix-bzrlog
Merge into: lp://qastaging/bzr-explorer
Diff against target: 39 lines (+5/-6)
2 files modified
NEWS (+3/-0)
lib/app_suite.py (+2/-6)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~andrebachmann-dd/bzr-explorer/fix-bzrlog
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Martin Packman (community) Approve
Review via email: mp+117291@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

Simple fix for the problem with Bazaar on Windows that you got a Windows error 123 when trying to view the bzr system log via bzr-explorer.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

You need to at least update the comments as you're updating the code. :)

Only real question is what version the split function was fixed, against how far back bzr-explorer tries to remain compatible. Checking now, seems it's been in bzrlib since 2.2, and bzr-explorer was updated in r513 to use the unbroken version, but these comments were missed so the quote hack didn't get reverted.

A cleanup of this module not to use command line strings would be nice, but isn't needed here. Just fix or delete the outdated comments and this will do.

review: Needs Fixing
567. By PKO

Removed outdated comments

Revision history for this message
André Bachmann (andrebachmann-dd) wrote :

> You need to at least update the comments as you're updating the code. :)
>
> Only real question is what version the split function was fixed, against how
> far back bzr-explorer tries to remain compatible. Checking now, seems it's
> been in bzrlib since 2.2, and bzr-explorer was updated in r513 to use the
> unbroken version, but these comments were missed so the quote hack didn't get
> reverted.
>
> A cleanup of this module not to use command line strings would be nice, but
> isn't needed here. Just fix or delete the outdated comments and this will do.

I removed the old comments.

Revision history for this message
Martin Packman (gz) wrote :

Thanks!

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches