lp://qastaging/~kamstrup/dee/filter-models-ng

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Merged into lp://qastaging/dee at revision 320

Michal Hruby (community): Approve on 2011-12-15

Diff: 1257 lines (+420/-277)

12 files modified

dee/Makefile.am (+2/-2)
dee/dee-filter-model.c (+23/-26)
dee/dee-filter-model.h (+4/-61)
dee/dee-filter.c (+198/-96)
dee/dee-filter.h (+103/-9)
dee/dee-model-reader.c (+2/-2)
dee/dee-model-reader.h (+5/-2)
dee/dee.h (+1/-1)
doc/reference/dee-1.0/dee-1.0-docs.sgml (+1/-1)
tests/test-filter-model.c (+52/-39)
vapi/Dee-1.0-custom.vala (+6/-14)
vapi/dee-1.0.vapi (+23/-24)

api

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Bug #904293: DeeFilter and DeeFilterModel can not work properly with GI and/or PyGI

High

Fix Released

Link a bug report

Related blueprints

324. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-15

Make DeeFilterMapNotify and dee_filter_notify() return a gboolean. TRUE if the iter was added to the filter model.

Also fix (scope notified) annotaitons in DeeFilter and DeeModelReader.

Update VAPI accordingly

323. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-15

Update VAPI for DeeFilter and DeeFilterModel

322. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-14

Add a privacy annotation on the DeeFilter members that are just padding

321. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-14

Overhaul DeeFilter and DeeFilter model to make it compatible with GI and PyGI like DeeIndex and DeeModelReader already does it. The API break is only slight though and apps should be straight forward to port

320. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-14

Remove G_GNUC_CONST for all dee_*_get_type() functions. It is outright wrong to put that on get_type() function and have just been dragged on since forever in fear of breaking ABI.

319. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-14

Fix some compilation warnings in the test suite

318. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-13

Emit signal by id, not by name, in DeeSequenceModel for a small perf gain

The benchmark suite indicates a 0 > x > 1% perf gain from this - but non-zero!
I expect the numbers to be slightly better on lower end hardware, and also when
looking on the actual spend CPU time, which I haven't done.. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901098. Appoved by Michal Hruby.

317. By Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen on 2011-12-07

Add a small simple benchmark suite

This branch adds a new make target 'benchmark' or stand alone executable
to the test suite tests/test-benchmark.

It produces some simple statistical output and it's easy to add new
benchmarks in there.. Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901100. Appoved by Michal Hruby.

316. By Michal Hruby on 2011-12-05

. Fixes: . Reviewed by Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen.

315. By Michal Hruby on 2011-12-02

Bump API version. Fixes: . Reviewed by Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen.