Merge lp://qastaging/~knightrider0xd/openlp/better-slide-scaling into lp://qastaging/openlp

Proposed by Ian Knight
Status: Merged
Approved by: Tim Bentley
Approved revision: 2632
Merged at revision: 2636
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~knightrider0xd/openlp/better-slide-scaling
Merge into: lp://qastaging/openlp
Diff against target: 395 lines (+283/-9)
4 files modified
openlp/core/common/settings.py (+1/-0)
openlp/core/ui/advancedtab.py (+12/-0)
openlp/core/ui/listpreviewwidget.py (+42/-4)
tests/functional/openlp_core_ui/test_listpreviewwidget.py (+228/-5)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~knightrider0xd/openlp/better-slide-scaling
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
Tim Bentley Approve
Raoul Snyman Approve
Review via email: mp+290694@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2016-03-20.

Description of the change

Adds the ability to choose a maximum height for non-text slides in the list-preview-widget in slide controllers. See branch description for further details. May require sanity check.

Changes since last proposal:
- Fixed copy-paste error in comments
- Shifted common test code into setup function as recommended.
- Testing max height doesn't exceed settings spin-box (as requested) not changed as any positive int is valid & spin-box values are arbitrary. (See reply to diff comments on r2630 for details)

lp:~knightrider0xd/openlp/better-slide-scaling (revision 2632)
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-01-Pull/1340/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-02-Functional-Tests/1260/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-03-Interface-Tests/1199/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-04a-Windows_Functional_Tests/1034/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-04b-Windows_Interface_Tests/625/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-05a-Code_Analysis/692/
[SUCCESS] https://ci.openlp.io/job/Branch-05b-Test_Coverage/560/

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
Tim Bentley (trb143) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

see inline comments

review: Needs Fixing
Revision history for this message
Ian Knight (knightrider0xd) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Thanks for the feedback. See replies to inline comments.

Revision history for this message
Ian Knight (knightrider0xd) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal
Revision history for this message
Tomas Groth (tomasgroth) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Hi,
Remember to resubmit your merge proposal when it is ready for another review.
And you should probably just leave the branchs status as "development", we use "mature" for the release branches :)

Revision history for this message
Ian Knight (knightrider0xd) wrote : Posted in a previous version of this proposal

Thanks Tomas, I wasn't sure what the procedure was :)

Revision history for this message
Raoul Snyman (raoul-snyman) wrote :

Works for me.

review: Approve
Revision history for this message
Tim Bentley (trb143) :
review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.