LAVA Android Test

Merge lp://qastaging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/support-testprovider into lp://qastaging/lava-android-test

support-testprovider
Merge into trunk

Proposed by Yongqin Liu on 2012-06-16

Status:	Merged
Merged at revision:	182
Proposed branch:	lp://qastaging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/support-testprovider
Merge into:	lp://qastaging/lava-android-test
Diff against target:	889 lines (+427/-203) 14 files modified MANIFEST.in (+1/-0) doc/usage.rst (+49/-20) lava_android_test/commands.py (+10/-10) lava_android_test/provider.py (+238/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/bluetooth.py (+1/-49) lava_android_test/test_definitions/commands/example.py (+23/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/commands/tjunittest.py (+23/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/instruments/example.py (+22/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/memtester.py (+0/-1) lava_android_test/test_definitions/mmtest.py (+1/-49) lava_android_test/test_definitions/shells/__init__.py (+2/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/shells/example.sh (+4/-0) lava_android_test/test_definitions/wifi.py (+1/-49) lava_android_test/testdef.py (+52/-25)
To merge this branch:	bzr merge lp://qastaging/~liuyq0307/lava-android-test/support-testprovider
Related bugs:	Link a bug report
Related blueprints:	Make the integration of android-instrument-test/android-shell-test/android-command-test easily (Low)

Reviewer	Review Type	Date Requested	Status
Andy Doan (community)		2012-06-16	Approve on 2012-06-28
Review via email: mp+110650@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

make the following 3 types test integration into lava-android-test easier than before.
1. Instrumentation test, run like “adb shell am instrument ...”
2. Android command test, run like “adb shell test-command”. like the tjunittest/memtest/iozone
3. Android shell test, need to write a shell and run like “adb shell script.sh”

Revision history for this message

Andy Doan (doanac) wrote on 2012-06-27:

looks like the new class "CommonTestProvider(TestProvider)" isn't used anywhere. Can we remove that?

otherwise - I think it looks good, but I didn't do any testing

Revision history for this message

Yongqin Liu (liuyq0307) wrote on 2012-06-28:

> looks like the new class "CommonTestProvider(TestProvider)" isn't used
> anywhere. Can we remove that?
282 + if name != 'CommonTestProvider':
No, it is used here, use this provider to substitute the testloader method in
lava_android_test/testdef.py, where we load the test definitions now.