Merge lp://qastaging/~milo/linaro-image-tools/var-refactoring into lp://qastaging/linaro-image-tools/11.11

Proposed by Milo Casagrande
Status: Merged
Approved by: James Tunnicliffe
Approved revision: 598
Merged at revision: 597
Proposed branch: lp://qastaging/~milo/linaro-image-tools/var-refactoring
Merge into: lp://qastaging/linaro-image-tools/11.11
Diff against target: 174 lines (+31/-30)
2 files modified
linaro_image_tools/media_create/android_boards.py (+11/-11)
linaro_image_tools/media_create/boards.py (+20/-19)
To merge this branch: bzr merge lp://qastaging/~milo/linaro-image-tools/var-refactoring
Reviewer Review Type Date Requested Status
James Tunnicliffe (community) Approve
linaro-image-tools maintainers Pending
Review via email: mp+142093@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

A simple variable name refactoring in order to have the same name between boards.py and android_boards.py.
Tests do not need to be changed.

To post a comment you must log in.
Revision history for this message
James Tunnicliffe (dooferlad) wrote :

Looks fine, though I wonder if it is worth picking up more:

46 @@ -547,7 +548,7 @@
47 lowmem_opt = ''
48 boot_snippet = 'root=%s' % rootfs_id
49 if is_live:
50 - serial_opts += ' %s' % self.live_serial_opts
51 + serial_opts += ' %s' % self.live_serial_options
52 boot_snippet = 'boot=casper'
53 if is_lowmem:
54 lowmem_opt = 'only-ubiquity'

I would change the local serial_opts variable to be consistent. There are a few places in android_boards where serial_opts turns up as well.

598. By Milo Casagrande

Refactored serial_opts into serial_options.

Revision history for this message
Milo Casagrande (milo) wrote :

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:20 PM, James Tunnicliffe
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I would change the local serial_opts variable to be consistent. There are a few places in android_boards where serial_opts turns up as well.

Should be done now.
Thanks.

--
Milo Casagrande | Infrastructure Team
Linaro.org <www.linaro.org> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Revision history for this message
James Tunnicliffe (dooferlad) wrote :

Looks good.

review: Approve

Preview Diff

[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
The diff is not available at this time. You can reload the page or download it.

Subscribers

People subscribed via source and target branches