Linaro Android Build Tools

Merge lp://qastaging/~mwhudson/linaro-android-build-tools/submit-to-owned-stream into lp://qastaging/linaro-android-build-tools

submit-to-owned-stream
Merge into trunk

Proposed by Michael Hudson-Doyle on 2012-03-26

Status:	Merged
Approved by:	Paul Sokolovsky on 2012-04-19
Approved revision:	429
Merged at revision:	445
Proposed branch:	lp://qastaging/~mwhudson/linaro-android-build-tools/submit-to-owned-stream
Merge into:	lp://qastaging/linaro-android-build-tools
Diff against target:	90 lines (+9/-14) 1 file modified build-scripts/post-build-lava.py (+9/-14)
To merge this branch:	bzr merge lp://qastaging/~mwhudson/linaro-android-build-tools/submit-to-owned-stream
Related bugs:	Link a bug report

Reviewer	Date Requested	Status
James Tunnicliffe (community)	2012-04-02	Approve on 2012-04-02
Paul Sokolovsky	2012-03-26	Approve on 2012-04-02
Review via email: mp+99249@code.qastaging.launchpad.net

Description of the change

Hi, this branch changes the build script to submit LAVA jobs that submit to owned streams (we're trying to phase out the usage of anonymous streams in LAVA).

I removed some unused generality. If you really need to submit different results to different streams, that will require a little bit more shuffling, or being able to put templates in PRODUCT_MAP or something, but that seems like it can be deferred until it's needed.

Cheers,
mwh

Revision history for this message

Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote on 2012-04-02:

Ping?

Revision history for this message

Paul Sokolovsky (pfalcon) wrote on 2012-04-02:

My only concern are if frontend changes would be required to support this? Otherwise, looks good.

review: Approve

Revision history for this message

James Tunnicliffe (dooferlad) wrote on 2012-04-02:

Looks fine to me.

review: Approve

Revision history for this message

Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote on 2012-04-02:

Thanks for the reviews James & Paul.

On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:04:26 -0000, Paul Sokolovsky <email address hidden> wrote:
> Review: Approve
>
> My only concern are if frontend changes would be required to support
> this? Otherwise, looks good.

The frontend works in job and bundle ids, so is unaffected by the stream
submitted to.

If we ever want to start submitting to private bundle streams we should
make some changes so that the experience for users who are not logged in
to validation.linaro.org is understandable, but that can come later :)

Cheers,
mwh

Revision history for this message

Paul Sokolovsky (pfalcon) wrote on 2012-04-19:

Ok, kinda though Michael may want to merge this himself at the right time for this, but let me do this so it didn't sleep.

Revision history for this message

Paul Sokolovsky (pfalcon) wrote on 2012-04-19:

slip

Revision history for this message

Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) wrote on 2012-04-19:

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:02:28 -0000, Paul Sokolovsky <email address hidden> wrote:
> Ok, kinda though Michael may want to merge this himself at the right time for this, but let me do this so it didn't sleep.

I don't think I could have :-) I'm not in ~linaro-infrastructure any
more.

Cheers,
mwh