Merge lp://qastaging/~openerp-dev/openerp-india/payroll-india-trunk-improve-salary-rules-kbh into lp://qastaging/~openerp-dev/openerp-india/payroll-india-trunk
Proposed by
Khushboo Bhatt(openerp)
Status: | Merged |
---|---|
Merge reported by: | Mustufa Rangwala (Open ERP) |
Merged at revision: | not available |
Proposed branch: | lp://qastaging/~openerp-dev/openerp-india/payroll-india-trunk-improve-salary-rules-kbh |
Merge into: | lp://qastaging/~openerp-dev/openerp-india/payroll-india-trunk |
Diff against target: |
874 lines (+363/-199) 7 files modified
hr_payroll/hr_payroll_demo.xml (+0/-8) l10n_in_hr_payroll/__openerp__.py (+4/-3) l10n_in_hr_payroll/data/hr.salary.rule.csv (+6/-9) l10n_in_hr_payroll/l10n_in_hr_payroll.py (+60/-1) l10n_in_hr_payroll/l10n_in_hr_payroll_data.xml (+256/-171) l10n_in_hr_payroll/l10n_in_hr_payroll_view.xml (+37/-6) l10n_in_hr_payroll/security/hr.salary.rule.csv (+0/-1) |
To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://qastaging/~openerp-dev/openerp-india/payroll-india-trunk-improve-salary-rules-kbh |
Related bugs: |
Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Mustufa Rangwala (Open ERP) | Approve | ||
Khushboo Bhatt(openerp) | Pending | ||
Review via email:
|
This proposal supersedes a proposal from 2012-05-23.
Description of the change
Hello,
code improved as per suggestion.
Thank you,
KBH.
To post a comment you must log in.
- Correct salary rules code, Dont use _ in the code while defining salary rules.
- Gratuity rule is not working.
- Put description on rule in proper text.
- import in py file should be defined as per pep8 standard.
- recheck line 162-168 again, I dont find any difference there.
- on contract: No_of_year do not define field start with capital just use number_of_year and allow user to write on that function field.
- Use tooltip to expalin all the fields defined on contact for payslip
- remove CEA category we should use allowance
- fix security folder, hr.salaray.head object has been removed.
Thanks,
Mustufa