Code review comment for lp://qastaging/~3v1n0/libindicator/parent-object-fixes
Revision history for this message
| Charles Kerr (charlesk) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
demo site
(Get the code!)
Ah, that makes sense. dummy-signaler predates this other entry-related code. Its the author probably just threw in a number because he didn't need a real entry, and an int pointer was fast & easy to test.
I agree with you, it would be better to bring the test up-to-date.