Just nits - nothing worth not merging over:
django hook.py 1131 - p = 'PYTHONPATH=%s' % config_data.get('python_path', install_root) 1132 + def_path = '%s:%s' % (config_dir, code_dir) 1133 + p = 'PYTHONPATH=%s' % config_data.get('python_path', def_path)
1269 - relation_set({'python_path': install_root}) 1270 + relation_set({'python_path': '%s:%s' % (config_dir, code_dir)})
I think the relation_set should use the same logic as line 1133 uses?
ppa-assigner.yaml: 1468 + python_path: /srv/ppa_django/conf:/srv/ppa_django/code/ci-utils:/srv/ppa_django/code/ppa-assigner
Is this needed now, or should the relation_set (now that its been updated) handle this setting properly.
Untested by me.
« Back to merge proposal
Just nits - nothing worth not merging over:
django hook.py data.get( 'python_ path', install_root) data.get( 'python_ path', def_path)
1131 - p = 'PYTHONPATH=%s' % config_
1132 + def_path = '%s:%s' % (config_dir, code_dir)
1133 + p = 'PYTHONPATH=%s' % config_
1269 - relation_ set({'python_ path': install_root}) set({'python_ path': '%s:%s' % (config_dir, code_dir)})
1270 + relation_
I think the relation_set should use the same logic as line 1133 uses?
ppa-assigner.yaml: django/ conf:/srv/ ppa_django/ code/ci- utils:/ srv/ppa_ django/ code/ppa- assigner
1468 + python_path: /srv/ppa_
Is this needed now, or should the relation_set (now that its been updated) handle this setting properly.
Untested by me.