Code review comment for lp://qastaging/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/lp988601

Revision history for this message
jazzynico (jazzynico) wrote :

@~suv - Since the branch is no longer active and replaced with another branch, I'd use the "Reject" status. "Merged" doesn't seen appropriate because the branch (lp988601) is not merged and we can't link it to a revision number. "Superseded" would be very handy here indeed...

« Back to merge proposal