Merge lp://qastaging/~javier.collado/utah/bug1160857 into lp://qastaging/utah
Proposed by
Javier Collado
| Status: | Merged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by: | Javier Collado | ||||
| Approved revision: | 846 | ||||
| Merged at revision: | 844 | ||||
| Proposed branch: | lp://qastaging/~javier.collado/utah/bug1160857 | ||||
| Merge into: | lp://qastaging/utah | ||||
| Diff against target: |
86 lines (+12/-1) 7 files modified
debian/changelog (+6/-0) examples/run_install_test.py (+1/-0) examples/run_test_bamboo_feeder.py (+1/-1) examples/run_test_cobbler.py (+1/-0) examples/run_test_vm.py (+1/-0) examples/run_utah_tests.py (+1/-0) utah/run.py (+1/-0) |
||||
| To merge this branch: | bzr merge lp://qastaging/~javier.collado/utah/bug1160857 | ||||
| Related bugs: |
|
| Reviewer | Review Type | Date Requested | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Collado (community) | Approve | ||
| Max Brustkern (community) | Approve | ||
|
Review via email:
|
|||
Description of the change
This branch adds a new return code UNHANDLED_ERROR that is returned by the
server when an non UTAH exception is caught (before this change, a succes
return code was returned).
Note that I've started a new version number in debian/changelog since the
latest one was already released. For the future, I think that once a new
version is released a new commit has to be pushed to start the new version
number since that shouldn't be part of a merge request like this one.
To post a comment you must log in.
Preview Diff
[H/L] Next/Prev Comment, [J/K] Next/Prev File, [N/P] Next/Prev Hunk
Looks good to me, but I haven't tested it. If you have, we should be fine.