Merge lp://qastaging/~linaro-infrastructure/linaro-ci/fix_bug_912151 into lp://qastaging/linaro-ci

Are we certain that only omap3 hwpacks need the name to be "linaro-{flavour}" and everything else needs "linaro-lt-{flavour}": your description above suggests only Panda should use "linaro-lt", so I just wanted to check?

> Are we certain that only omap3 hwpacks need the name to be "linaro-{flavour}"
> and everything else needs "linaro-lt-{flavour}": your description above
> suggests only Panda should use "linaro-lt", so I just wanted to check?

Yes, I have checked the latest omap3 hwpacks available on s.l.o and the vmlinuz have an extension of linaro-{flavour} unlike panda hwpacks where the hwpacks have "linaro-lt-{flavour}".

I do not have correct details for origen boards as of now. They previously worked with the "linaro-{flavour}" extension. I believe now the origen hwpacks vmlinuz just end with {falvour} in their name. But, since yesterday I am not successful in using the the latest origen hwpack as it is failing with l-m-c. If you think I should make the changes for the origen board as well I can do it, but I cannot guarantee the testing aspect of it. Do you think otherwise ?

Thanks!!!
Deepti.

No, let's do everything step at the time.

However, I am asking because previous code was using "{config}-linaro-{flavour}" for everything, and you are now changing it to be "{config}-linaro-lt-{flavour}" for *everything* except omap3. Does it not make more sense to explicitely check for panda instead?

> No, let's do everything step at the time.
>
> However, I am asking because previous code was using
> "{config}-linaro-{flavour}" for everything, and you are now changing it to be
> "{config}-linaro-lt-{flavour}" for *everything* except omap3. Does it not
> make more sense to explicitely check for panda instead?

Done, please review the changes.

Thanks!!!
Deepti.

Looks good, thanks.

Thanks!
Deepti.