Code review comment for lp://qastaging/~linaro-infrastructure/linaro-ci/fix_bug_912151

Revision history for this message
Deepti B. Kalakeri (deeptik) wrote :

> Are we certain that only omap3 hwpacks need the name to be "linaro-{flavour}"
> and everything else needs "linaro-lt-{flavour}": your description above
> suggests only Panda should use "linaro-lt", so I just wanted to check?

Yes, I have checked the latest omap3 hwpacks available on s.l.o and the vmlinuz have an extension of linaro-{flavour} unlike panda hwpacks where the hwpacks have "linaro-lt-{flavour}".

I do not have correct details for origen boards as of now. They previously worked with the "linaro-{flavour}" extension. I believe now the origen hwpacks vmlinuz just end with {falvour} in their name. But, since yesterday I am not successful in using the the latest origen hwpack as it is failing with l-m-c. If you think I should make the changes for the origen board as well I can do it, but I cannot guarantee the testing aspect of it. Do you think otherwise ?

Thanks!!!
Deepti.

« Back to merge proposal