Code review comment for lp://qastaging/~liuyq0307/lava-lab/keep-one-fastmodel-per-node

Revision history for this message
Yongqin Liu (liuyq0307) wrote :

On 23 September 2013 20:59, Dave Pigott <email address hidden> wrote:

> Review: Needs Fixing
>
> So, previous to this change we had:
>
> fastmodels01
> rtsm_foundation-armv8_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x1-a7x1_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x4-a7x4_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x4-a7x4_02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_03
> rtsm_ve-armv8_04
> fastmodels02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_01
> rtsm_ve-armv8_02
> fastmodels03
> rtsm_foundation-armv8_02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_05
>
> And after this change we would have:
>
> fastmodels01
> rtsm_foundation-armv8_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x1-a7x1_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x4-a7x4_01
> rtsm_ve-a15x4-a7x4_02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_01
>
> fastmodels02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_02
>
> fastmodels03
> rtsm_foundation-armv8_02
> rtsm_ve-armv8_03
>
> So in fact, your change does not remove multiple fast models except on one
> server, fastmodels02.
>
yes, the aim of this change is to have only one rtsm_ve_armv8_0x device on
each node, and adjust the device name identity to the physical machine
node name.
and as far as I know, there is no android image will be tested on
rtsm_foundation-xxx devices, so it should be OK IMO.
for rtsm_ve-a15xxxx devices, we need to see how much effect they would
make, for now seems it's OK.
in the past time, when we have only rtsm_ve-armv8_03 or rtsm_ve-armv8_04
online, the test job works well.
(maybe the load caused by rtsm_ve-a15xxxx devices is not too large).

>
> Perhaps the solution is to have a new device type, rtsm_ve-armv8-single
> which is guaranteed to run on a single node, and only provide one of those.
>
My main issue here is that if we have to have a server per fast model
> instance, then to support the current load and spread, and future new fast
> model types, I need 10 servers, at $2000 each, one per fast model instance.
> That seems rather excessive.
>

For this part about if we should have a server per fast model instance, I
think it is under discussion now.

> You will need to get authorisation from Mark Orvek for that sort of spend.
>
> --
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~liuyq0307/lava-lab/keep-one-fastmodel-per-node/+merge/185963
> You are the owner of lp:~liuyq0307/lava-lab/keep-one-fastmodel-per-node.
>

--
Thanks,
Yongqin Liu
---------------------------------------------------------------
#mailing list
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-validation

« Back to merge proposal