> fixed the last 2. Yes, could typedef the first one but I personally am not a
> fan of typedefs... makes the code more opaque IMO as the reader has to look up
> what the type actually is...
+1
They're not always helpful. Telling from experience from reading Mir and MirAL code.
> fixed the last 2. Yes, could typedef the first one but I personally am not a
> fan of typedefs... makes the code more opaque IMO as the reader has to look up
> what the type actually is...
+1
They're not always helpful. Telling from experience from reading Mir and MirAL code.