1895 + # XXX: is this here to swallow exceptions or ny mistake?
It's there to swallow exceptions. It's okay if couchdb isn't running.
2013 - logging.warn("There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
2014 + pass
2015 + ## logging.warn(
2016 + ## "There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
2017 except gnomekeyring.CancelledError:
2018 - logging.warn("There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
2019 + pass
2020 + ## logging.warn(
2021 + ## "There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
200 - logging. exception( "failed to back-up %s" % (srcname,)) exception( "failed to back-up %s", (srcname,))
201 + logging.
Shouldn't be a tuple now.
236 - super(Exception, self).__init__() kenException, self).__init__()
237 + super(NoOAuthTo
Good catch. I wonder where that came from.
1895 + # XXX: is this here to swallow exceptions or ny mistake?
It's there to swallow exceptions. It's okay if couchdb isn't running.
2013 - logging.warn("There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.") CancelledError:
2014 + pass
2015 + ## logging.warn(
2016 + ## "There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
2017 except gnomekeyring.
2018 - logging.warn("There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
2019 + pass
2020 + ## logging.warn(
2021 + ## "There is no keyring to store our admin credentials.")
I don't understand this change.
2323 - self._mainloop.stop
2324 + # XXX: call this?
2325 + self._mainloop.stop # pylint: disable=W0104
Hrm, good question. Mocker is interesting this way. I'll look into this.