Code review comment for lp://qastaging/~tyhicks/apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu/lp1260103

Although I haven’t actually tested, that looks mostly good to me, and is consistent with the changeset in oxide.

Note that this change was introduced in the 1.17 branch of oxide, so you don’t want to make the change effective in apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu until oxide 1.17 is released (or the old rule should be kept temporarily until 1.17 is released).

Note that /dev/shm/@{APP_PKGNAME}.oxide is a directory under which oxide will write files. I’m no apparmor expert, but shouldn’t the rule end with a '/' to reflect that?