> Line 160 is pointless. You are asserting that something is empty after you > just assigned it to "".
Yes, I know, but I added that to be extra-sure that it was true, and making the tests to fail instead :)
> Do we have any AP tests for the indicators? I'm not sure we do.
No, we haven't yet. I would like to introduce some of them, I've already done some introspection work.
« Back to merge proposal
> Line 160 is pointless. You are asserting that something is empty after you
> just assigned it to "".
Yes, I know, but I added that to be extra-sure that it was true, and making the tests to fail instead :)
> Do we have any AP tests for the indicators? I'm not sure we do.
No, we haven't yet. I would like to introduce some of them, I've already done some introspection work.